The High Court held that the criminal appeal filed by Kuldip Singh stands abated due to the appellant's death during its pendency, relying on the principle laid down in Shivji Ram @ Dimple.
The appeal stands abated and is disposed of. Pending criminal miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
201
CRA-S-1643-SB-2006 (O&M) Decided on : 24.04.2023
Kuldip Singh
. . . Appellant(s)
Versus
State of Punjab
. . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH
PRESENT: Mr. L. S. Sidhu, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Anmol Singh Sandhu, AAG, Punjab.
SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral)
RIYA 2023.04.24 16:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRA-S-1643-SB-2006 (O&M)
- 2 -
# 2076392).
disposed of.
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE
24.04.2023 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
RIYA 2023.04.24 16:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Shivji Ram @ Dimple Vs. State of PunjabExplained¶4
Shivji Ram @ Dimple Vs. State of Punjab (IOIN-CRA-S-4686-SB-2018 in CRA-S-4686-SB-2018, decided on 24.11.2022, 2022 SCC OnLine P&H 3759: Law Finder Doc ID RIYA
Kuldip Singh
State of Punjab
Sanjay Vashisth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
