Rana Ranjeet Kumar Singh v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner counsel moved to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The petition was dismissed accordingly.
Petitioner counsel moved to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The petition was dismissed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
103
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-725-2023 (O&M)
Date of Decision: January 27, 2023
Rana Ranjeet Kumar Singh ……Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana …..Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
-.-
Present:Mr. Anoop Verma, Advocate for the petitioner.
-.-
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0012 dated 03.11.2021 under Sections 201, 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC and Section 3 of HPID Act registered at Police Station Cyber Crime, Hisar.
Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
27.01.2023 sanjay
( HARKESH MANUJA ) JUDGE
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No |
|---|---|
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
SANJAY GUPTA 2023.01.27 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Rana Ranjeet Kumar Singh
State of Haryana
Harkesh Manuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court