Allowed

Junaid Ali v. State of Punjab

Punjab & Haryana HC27 Jan 2023CRM-M/3447/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition for regular bail in trial for murder and abduction charges. Bench allowed bail noting petitioner's 4.5-year incarceration, reliance on extra-judicial confession, parity with co-accused, and pendency of official witness examination.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered to be released on bail subject to furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to satisfaction of trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

Junaid Ali Vs State of Punjab — Bail and Remand | Punjab & Haryana HC (2023)

¶1

--1--

¶2

CRM-M-3447-2023 (O&M)

¶3

208 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM-M-3447-2023 (O&M) Decided on:-27.01.2023

Junaid Ali

....Petitioner..

vs.

State of Punjab

....Respondent.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

¶11

Present: Mr. Nikhil Ghai, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶12

Mr.Amit Shukla, AAG, Punjab for the respondent-State. *****

¶13

HARKESH MANUJA J. (Oral)

¶14

By way of present petition, petitioner prays for grant of regular bail during pendency of trial in case FIR No.43 dated 20.05.2018, under Sections 364, 302, 201, 365, 120-B IPC and Sections 25/27/54/59 of the Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Tarshikka, District Amritsar.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR and he is behind the bars for the last more than 4 years and 6 months now, and all the material witnesses already stand examined before the trial court. Seeking parity, learned counsel for the petitioner has also relied upon orders dated 21.12.2022 and 25.01.2023 passed by this Court in CRM-M-9206-2020 titled as “Masoom Ali vs. State of Punjab” and CRM-M-3217-2023 titled as “Sharif Mohammad @ Shia vs. State of Punjab” respectively . It has also been submitted that the present is the case of circumstantial evidence, thus, prays for grant of concession of regular bail.

¶16

On the other hand, prayer made in the present petition has been opposed by learned State counsel while submitting that the prosecution

¶17

SONIKA 2023.01.27 18:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶18

--2--

¶19

CRM-M-3447-2023 (O&M)

¶20

witnesses have specifically deposed against the petitioner during trial implicating him in the alleged offence. He also submits that out of total of 56 witnesses cited by the prosecution, 13 stand already examined and now the trial is fixed for 13.02.2023, however, he has not been able to controvert the plea of parity raised at the instance of the petitioner.

¶21

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the paper book.

¶22

Considering the facts that the petitioner is behind the bars for the last more than 4 years and 6 months now and the entire prosecution case is based on extra-judicial confession as well as last seen theory, which shall be adjudicated upon by the trial court in due course, any further incarceration of the petitioner shall be unjustified as all the material private witnesses have already been examined by prosecution and the examination of other official witnesses is definitely going to take some time.

¶23

More than that, I also find merit in the submission raised at the instance of the petitioner as regards his claim of parity with co-accused, namely, Masoom Ali and Sharif Mohammad @ Shia, who have already been granted the concession of regular bail by this Court vide orders dated 21.12.2022 and 25.01.2023 respectively.

¶24

In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the mertis of the case, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, subject to his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

¶25

27.01.2023 sonika

¶26

Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable:

¶27

(HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE

¶28

Yes/No Yes/ No

¶29

SONIKA 2023.01.27 18:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Junaid Ali v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Junaid Ali v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sharif Mohammad @ Shia Vs State of Punjab

Amrik Singh @ Kaloo Vs State of Punjab

Kuldeep Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Rana Ranjeet Kumar Singh Vs State of Haryana

Harjit Singh Alias Jita Vs State of Punjab

Rajeev Sood Vs State of Punjab and Others