The court dismissed the petition by referring to a detailed order of the same date passed in a related matter, CRM-M-61448-2023, and did not pronounce separate reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CRM-M-61451-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-61451-2023 Reserved on: 13.12.2023 Pronounced on: 19.12.2023 Prem Sagar Sharma ...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab …Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Vinod Ghai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rahul Bhargava, Advocate Mr. Arnav Ghai, Advocate Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Luvinder Sofat, DAG, Punjab.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
For detailed order, see the order of even date passed in CRM-M-61448-
2023 titled as Sunil Kumar Gupta vs. State of Punjab.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 19.12.2023 anju rani Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No.
ANJU RANI 2023.12.19 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1
Prem Sagar Sharma
State of Punjab
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
