The High Court dismissed Civil Revision No. 950 of 2019 as withdrawn after learning counsel for the petitioner prayed for withdrawal of the petition. The order contains no substantive legal proposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:043694
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
252
Civil Revision No. 950 of 2019
Date of decision :-22.03.2023
Sandeep Bhatia
…..Petitioner
Versus
Leenu
…..Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present:Mr. Raj Kumar Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner.
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal
of the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
March 22, 2023 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) Vijay Asija JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
VIJAY ASIJA 2023.03.24 12:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sandeep Bhatia
Leenu
Nidhi Gupta
Vijay Asija
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
