Petitioners sought permission to withdraw their petition. Permission was granted and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
2023:PHHC:041114
101 TA-243-2023 Date of decision: 21.03.2023
LAKHBIR SINGH AND OTHERS
..Petitioners
Versus
SURMUKH SINGH AND OTHERS
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: Mr. UK Agnihotri, Advocate with Mr. Anshul Agnihotri, Advocate for the petitioners.
NIDHI GUPTA, J (Oral)
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the
petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
( NIDHI GUPTA ) 21.03.2023 JUDGE ashok
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
ASHOK KUMAR 2023.03.21 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Lakhibir Singh and Others
Surmukh Singh and Others
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
