The High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw a revision petition with liberty to avail available legal remedies. Pending applications stand disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
106 CR No.4228 of 2022 (O&M) Date of Decision : 15.02.2023
Seema Devi ....Petitioner
VERSUS
Jagjit Singh ....Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Rohan Garg, Advocate for the petitioner.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
In view of the judgments passed in the cases of Kiran Bala Srivastava vs. Jai Prakash Srivastava [(2005) 23 LCD 1] and Manish Aggarwal Vs. Seema Aggarwal & Ors. [2013 (7) RCR (Civil) 2109] , learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present revision petition with liberty to avail his remedies as available in law. Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2023.02.16 08:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. Chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kiran Bala Srivastava vs. Jai Prakash SrivastavaReferred¶9
Kiran Bala Srivastava vs. Jai Prakash Srivastava [(2005) 23 LCD 1]
Manish Aggarwal Vs. Seema Aggarwal & Ors.Referred¶9
Manish Aggarwal Vs. Seema Aggarwal & Ors. [2013 (7) RCR (Civil) 2109]
Seema Devi
Jagjit Singh
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
