Revision petition filed by tenant challenging ejectment orders was dismissed as infructuous after the petitioner purchased the disputed property during pendency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R-844
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-10-2014 (O&M) Date of decision : 15.02.2023
Vijay Kumar Gupta ... Petitioner(s) Versus Swaraj Kaur ... Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Ms. Prerna Malhotra, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present revision petition was filed by the tenant-petitioner against the ejectment orders passed by the authorities below and that during the pendency of the present revision petition the property in dispute has since been purchased by the tenant-petitioner and hence the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
( ALKA SARIN ) 15.02.2023 JUDGE Yogesh Sharma NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
YOGESH SHARMA 2023.02.16 10:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. Chandigarh
Vijay Kumar Gupta
Swaraj Kaur
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
