In an unrepresented bail or writ petition filed in 2006, the petitioner failed to appear. The single judge dismissed the application in default due to lack of interest by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
715
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-3137-2006 (O&M) Date of decision: February 13, 2023
Harpal Singh versus Mukhtiar Singh CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
….Petitioner
….Respondent
Present: - None for petitioner.
Mr. Swapan Shorey, Advocate for respondent.
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
None appears on behalf of petitioner. Case was filed sometime
in the year 2006. It seems that petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter.
Dismissed in-default.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(ARUN MONGA) JUDGE
February 13, 2023 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
MAHAVIR SINGH 2023.02.16 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment
Harpal Singh
Mukhtiar Singh
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
