The Court held that a revision petition involving possession of a shop was rendered infructuous as during pendency of proceedings, actual possession had been handed over to the petitioner-landlady.
Revision petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
815
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-3045-2014 (O&M) Date of decision: February 13, 2023
Amrit Kaur
….Petitioner
versus
Sat Bhushan
….Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present: - Mr. Gurmeet Singh Saini, Advocate for
Mr. S.C. Chhabra, Advocate for petitioner.
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner-landlady submits that during pendency of proceedings, possession of shop in question has been handed over, and revision petition is rendered infructuous.
Disposed of, accordingly.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(ARUN MONGA) JUDGE
February 13, 2023 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
MAHAVIR SINGH 2023.02.16 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment
Amrit Kaur
Sat Bhushan
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
