The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a revision petition as having become infructuous due to a compromise between the parties. Pending applications were also disposed of.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; pending applications disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R-318/3+116
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-2102-1992 (O&M) Date of decision : 23.02.2023
Mam Chand ... Petitioner(s) Versus Rohtas ... Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Hardeep Singh Kasan, Advocate for the respondent.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present revision petition has since been rendered infructuous in view of the compromise between the parties.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Pending
applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
( ALKA SARIN ) 23.02.2023 JUDGE Yogesh Sharma
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
YOGESH SHARMA 2023.02.24 09:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
Mam Chand
Rohtas
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
