A revision petition was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying civil suit, pending review of an Order VII Rule 11 application, was withdrawn due to a compromise between parties.
Revision petition dismissed as infructuous; pending applications disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
346 CR No.3883 of 2017 Date of Decision : 22.02.2023 Inderpreet Singh Saini ....Petitioner VERSUS Harjit Saini and Others ....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
The present revision petition has been filed challenging the dismissal of the application filed by the petitioner under Order VII Rule 11 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
During the pendency of the present revision petition, as per website of District Courts, Hoshiarpur, the parties to the lis have since compromised the matter and the suit itself stands withdrawn.
In view thereof, the present revision petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
( ALKA SARIN ) 22.02.2023 JUDGE jk
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2023.02.23 08:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. Chandigarh
Inderpreet Singh Saini
Harjit Saini
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
