Petitioner applied to withdraw the revision petition, citing compromise. Respondent had no objection. Court dismissed the revision petition as withdrawn and disposed of pending applications.
Revision petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
117+217 CR No.1864 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision : 09.02.2023
Bharat Bhushan Sharma ....Petitioner
VERSUS
Surinder Kumar Gupta ....Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. R.S. Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rahul Arora, Advocate for the respondent.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
The petitioner has filed an application being CM-2592-CII2023 for withdrawal of the present revision petition in view of the fact that the matter has been compromised between the parties.
Notice of the application.
Mr. Rahul Arora, Advocate, counsel for the respondent, accepts notice of the application and states that he has no objection if the present revision petition is permitted to be withdrawn by the petitioner.
For the reasons stated in the application (CM-2592-CII-2023) and in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent, the present revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2023.02.13 08:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. Chandigarh
Bharat Bhushan Sharma
Surinder Kumar Gupta
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
