The petitioner sought to withdraw a petition after the main civil suit was decided by the Civil Judge, Chandigarh, invoking the withdrawal mechanism under relevant CPC provisions. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as envisaged under Order 43 Rule 1A CPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
281 CR-1492-2022 Date of decision: 15.03.2023
SANJAY AGRO INDUSTRIES LTD.
..Petitioner
Versus
MUNISH CHAUDHARY
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: Mr. Rakesh Chopra, Advocate with Mr. Jashan Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner.
None for the respondent.
NIDHI GUPTA, J (Oral)
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the main suit stands decided by the Ld. Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Chandigarh, vide order dated 31.10.2022, copy of the same filed in the Court and is taken on record as Mark ‘A’ and therefore, he seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty as envisaged under Order 43 Rule 1A CPC.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
( NIDHI GUPTA ) 15.03.2023 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
ASHOK KUMAR 2023.03.16 13:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
SANJAY AGRO INDUSTRIES LTD.
MUNISH CHAUDHARY
NIDHI GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
