The petitioner sought to withdraw the present petition before the High Court. The court permitted the withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
202 TA-296-2021 Date of decision: 14.03.2023
RAM AVTAR GUPTA
..Petitioner
Versus
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR HARYANA STATE WAREHOUSING CORP. AND OTHERS
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: Mr. Vikas Kumar Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate and
Mr. Daanish Mahajan, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2.
NIDHI GUPTA, J (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that present
petition has been rendered infructuous and therefore, he seeks to withdraw
the same.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
( NIDHI GUPTA ) 14.03.2023 JUDGE ashok
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
ASHOK KUMAR 2023.03.15 11:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
RAM AVTAR GUPTA
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR HARYANA STATE WAREHOUSING CORP. AND OTHERS
NIDHI GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
