Kusam Lata v. Meenakshi
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No. 1097 of 2019 DATE OF DECISION :- February 27, 2023
Smt. Kusam Lata
...Petitioner
Versus
Mrs. Meenakshi
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN
Present :- Mr. M.S. Uppal, Advocate for Mr. Manoj K. Sood, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Munish Kumar Garg, Advocate with Ms. Bhawan Thakur, Advocate for respondent. ***
Learned counsel for the revision petitioner states that since the main case has already been decided by the trial Court on 5.7.2021, the present revision petition has become infructuous. He has placed on record copy of the order passed by the trial Court.
Dismissed as infructuous.
(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE
February 27, 2023 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
PARVINDER SINGH 2023.02.28 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment Chandigarh
Smt. Kusam Lata
Mrs. Meenakshi
H.S. MADAAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court