Revision petition dismissed as infructuous following the decree of the main suit in the underlying trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-3020-2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 24.02.2023
Radha Rani
...Petitioner
Versus
Chander Shekhar and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN
H.S. MADAAN, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the respondents states that since the main suit has been decreed by the trial Court, vide judgment dated 27.01.2023, this revision petition challenging the order passed by Addl. District Judge, Fazilka setting aside order passed on application U/o 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC regarding ad-interim injunction by the trial Court has become infructuous. A copy of the judgment passed by the trial Court has been placed on record.
There is no representation of the petitioner. Similar was the position on the last two dates of hearing. Therefore, the revision petition is dismissed being infructuous.
SUMIT KUMAR 2023.02.27 11:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Radha Rani
Chander Shekhar
H.S. MADAAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
