Jagjit Singh v. Kulwant Singh and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Order disposing of a petition as infructuous due to alleged death of the petitioner, with liberty to revive proceedings if the statement of death is incorrect.
Order disposing of a petition as infructuous due to alleged death of the petitioner, with liberty to revive proceedings if the statement of death is incorrect.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
264
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-1030-2021 (O&M) Date of decision: 09.02.2023
JAGJIT SINGH …Petitioner
VS
KULWANT SINGH (deceased) through LRs AND OTHERS …Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present: Mr. J.K.Singla, Advocate, For the petitioner.
Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate For respondent No.1.
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for respondent No.1, at the outset, submits that petitioner has since expired and, therefore, proceedings before this Court are rendered infructuous.
On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioner states he has no such knowledge of the death of petitioner. A photocopy of death certificate has been given to him by learned counsel for respondent No.1 in course of hearing.
In the premise, petition is disposed of as infructuous with liberty to learned counsel for the petitioner to file an appropriate application for revival of the proceedings in case aforesaid statement is found to be incorrect.
Pending application, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
( ARUN MONGA) JUDGE
February 09, 2023 Vandana Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
VANDANA 2023.02.10 09:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Jagjit Singh
Kulwant Singh (deceased) through LRs AND OTHERS
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court