Rajpal v. Raj Naryana Managing Director and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous; liberty granted to avail alternative remedy.
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
Petition dismissed as infructuous; liberty granted to avail alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
248
2023:PHHC:098972
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-955-2023 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.08.2023
Rajpal
....Petitioner
Versus
Raj Naryana Managing Director and Anr
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present: Mr. Naveen Daryal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate and Ms. Prerna Malhotra, Advocate for the respondents.
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral)
Counsel for the respondents submit that subject to final
outcome of the final order in the LPA, the payment has been released.
Accordingly, counsel for the petitioner submits that this
petition may be disposed of having been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy in accordance with law, if so advised.
(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN)
JUDGE
02.08.2023
yakub
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
MOHD YAKUB 2023.08.02 15:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
Rajpal
Raj Naryana
Arvind Singh Sangwan
Mohd Yakub
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court