The High Court held a special civil application infructuous as the main writ petition remains pending. Liberty was granted to the petitioner to revive the current application after the writ petition is disposed of.
Liberty granted to the petitioner to revive the present petition upon disposal of the main writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
208
2023:PHHC:098080
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-3211-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 01.08.2023
Raj Kumar
....Petitioner
Versus
Suresh Kumar Sarpanch
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present: Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. A.K. Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Munish Mittal, Advocate for the respondent.
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral)
In view of the order dated 21.03.2023, counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition is still pending since some disputed facts are involved, therefore, till the time, the final verdict in the writ petition is pronounced, this petition is disposed of having been rendered infructuous.
However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to revive this petition after disposal of the writ petition, if so advised.
(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN)
JUDGE
01.08.2023
yakub
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
MOHD YAKUB 2023.08.01 15:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
Raj Kumar
Suresh Kumar Sarpanch
Arvind Singh Sangwan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
