A petition alleging violation of a 2016 direction regarding land status in Haryana was withdrawn by petitioners with permission to approach the Deputy Commissioner/SDO for alternative remedy if needed, given that affidavits stated the land is not in Haryana.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
236
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-19-2020 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.03.2023
Rajender Singh and Ors
....Petitioners
Versus
Atul Kumar and Ors
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present: Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Manish Dadwal, AAG, Haryana.
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral)
The petitioners alleges violation of the order dated 03.11.2016 vide which a direction was issued to the respondent to resolve the issue.
As per the affidavits of the Deputy Commissioner as well as the Sub-Divisional Officer-cum-Assistant Collector Grade I-cumTehsildar, Ballabgarh, it is stated that the land is not falling in the State of Haryana as per the demarcation conducted at the spot.
In view of the same, counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioners to avail the alternative remedy in accordance with law, if so advised. Ordered accordingly.
(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN) JUDGE
02.03.2023
yakub Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
MOHD YAKUB 2023.03.02 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether permission should be granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the appropriate authority for alternative remedy.
Rajender Singh and Ors
Atul Kumar and Ors
Arvind Singh Sangwan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
