Petitioner challenged an order rejecting an appeal in an educational matter. The court held the appeal was already rejected via a speaking order and the present petition was rendered infructuous, dismissing it.
Pending petition dismissed as infructuous; liberty granted to approach alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
235
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-14-2020 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.03.2023
Shashi Bala
....Petitioner
Versus
Krishan Kumar
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present: Mr. J.P.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ajit Singh Natt, AAG, Punjab.
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral)
Counsel for the State, on the basis of the affidavit of the Secretary to Government of Punjab, Department of Education, submits that since necessary compliance has been made and vide speaking order dated 22.01.2020 (Annexure R-1) the appeal filed by the petitioner stands rejected, this petition may be disposed of having been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy in accordance with law, if so advised.
(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN)
JUDGE
02.03.2023
yakub
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
MOHD YAKUB 2023.03.02 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shashi Bala
Krishan Kumar
Arvind Singh Sangwan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
