The High Court dismissed the arbitrability petition for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's complete absence despite previous opportunities to appear.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:088353
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
ARB-65-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision:-14.7.2023 M/s Saini Agro Industries … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:None for the petitioner.
Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Padamkant Dwivedi, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
A perusal of previous orders dated 20.2.2023 as well as 17.3.2023 shows that even on the said dates, there had been no appearance on behalf of the petitioner.
In view of the aforestated position, the instant petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
| 14.7.2023 pankaj |
( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) Judge |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether speaking /reasoned | Yes | / No | |
| Whether Reportable | Yes | / No |
PANKAJ KAKKAR 2023.07.14 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
M/s Saini Agro Industries
State of Haryana
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
