Appeal dismissed in default after the appellant failed to appear for hearing, despite adjournments granted, with the court explicitly denying further opportunities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.526 of 1991
Date of Decision: November 11 , 2022 .
Radha Krishan
...... APPELLANT (s)
Versus
Hari Ram and another
...... RESPONDENT (s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL
Present: None for the appellant.
Mr. Sanjay Mittal, Advocate for the respondents
LISA GILL, J.
None had appeared on behalf of the appellant on 09.09.2022 when this appeal was taken up for hearing. Same was adjourned on 16.09.2022 at request of learned counsel for the appellant. On the last date of hearing i.e., 30.09.2022, the matter was adjourned at request addressed on behalf of learned counsel for the appellant while making it clear that no further opportunity shall be afforded for addressing arguments.
Today, despite the matter being called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed in default.
( LISA GILL ) November 11 , 2022. JUDGE ‘om’
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
OMKAR SINGH 2022.11.14 14:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
Radha Krishan
Hari Ram
Lisa Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
