The petitioner withdrew the public interest litigation petition during the hearing. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-7534-2022 Date of decision:- 14.09.2022
Budh Ram and anr.
....Petitioners
vs.
State of Haryana & ors. ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl.A.G, Haryana with Mr. Saurabh Mago, AAG, Haryana
Ritu Bahri, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to
withdraw the petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(RITU BAHRI) JUDGE
14.09.2022 (NIDHI GUPTA) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
GAURAV ARORA 2022.09.16 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Budh Ram
State of Haryana
Ritu Bahri
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
