Disposed

Satinderpal Singh Dhanesar v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC10 Jan 2022CWP/330/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph order in a writ petition concerning bus operation timings was disposed of without reasoning after the respondents stated a meeting had been scheduled for the following day, with liberty granted to revive the petition if grievances persist.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of; petitioner granted liberty to revive the petition if grievances remain.

Satinderpal Singh Dhanesar Vs State of… — Service and Employment | Punjab & Haryana HC (2022)

¶1

125

¶2

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh

¶3

Civil Writ Petition No. 330 of 2022

¶4

Date of Decision: 10.01.2022

¶5

Satinderpal Singh Dhanesar

¶6

... Petitioner(s)

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Punjab and Others

¶9

... Respondent(s)

¶10

CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

¶11

Present: Mr. Raj Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

¶12

Mr. Nikhil Chopra, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents.

¶13

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

¶14

The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.3 to grant and issue the timings in the joint time-table to operate on the allotted permit Nos. 10/Reg/SB/RTA/ SGR/2021 and 54/Reg/SB/RTA/SGR/2021.

¶15

The petitioner claims that the previous time table has come to an end and he is entitled to operate his buses because the respondents have not finalized the time table.

¶16

On 17.12.2021, the Principal Secretary, Department of Transport, Punjab, had assured that in future, the time-table, relating to the operation of the buses, shall be issued in advance i.e. before the expiry of the validity of the previous time table and the transporters shall not be compelled to approach the Court for the aforesaid reason.

¶17

DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.01.17 10:32 I attest to the accuracy andintegrity of this document4. Mr. Nikhil Chopra, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, has

¶18

Civil Writ Petition No. 330 of 2022 2

¶19

stated that the meeting of the concerned officers has been scheduled for tomorrow.

¶20

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the writ petition is disposed of. However, if the petitioner still has a grievance, he shall be at liberty to

¶21

file an application for revival of the writ petition.

¶22

(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge

¶23

January 10, 2022 “DK”

¶24

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶25

DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.01.17 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Satinderpal Singh Dhanesar v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satinderpal Singh Dhanesar v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rachhpal Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and Others

Harpal and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Others

Vijay Kumar Vs M/S Shiv Lal Raj Kumar and Sons and Others

Pradeep Kumar Saigal Vs State of Haryana & Anr.

Sona Ram @ Sonu Vs State of Haryana

Jitenderpal Singh Basra Vs Darshan Singh Basra and Others