Single-judge writ order dismissing petitioner's challenge to a land acquisition notice by directing them to exhaust alternative remedies instead.
Petitioners relegated to avail the alternative remedy regarding the acquisition notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
125
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Writ Petition No. 207 of 2022
Date of Decision: 07.01.2022
Harpal and Others
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and Others
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.
Present: Mr. Rajesh Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Samarth Sagar, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondents,.
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge
January 07, 2022 “DK”
Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.01.10 10:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Harpal and Others
State of Haryana and Others
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
