Petitioner sought to withdraw the Constitutional Writ Petition with liberty to file fresh petition with better particulars. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with the suggested liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
204-2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.2568 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 26.04.2022
NARINDER SINGH
......Petitioner
Vs
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Present:Mr. H.S. Baath, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Karan Kumar Jund, Central Government Counsel for respondent No.1/Union of India.
Mr. Raman Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2/BPCL.
Mr. Anmol Chandan, Advocate for Mr. Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate for respondent No.3.
RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral)
After arguing this case for some time, learned counsel
for the petitioner wishes to withdraw this petition with a liberty to
file fresh petition with better particulars in accordance with law.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(RAJ MOHAN SINGH) April 26 , 2022 JUDGE Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
MOHMED ATIK 2022.04.27 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Narinder Singh
Union of India
Others
Raj Mohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
