Writ petition filed regarding dues was dismissed as infructuous since the entire dues had been paid.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 22104 of 2021 Date of Decision: September 27, 2022
Ranjit Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
The Managing Director, Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Company and another
...Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao Hon'ble Mr. Justice H.S. Madaan
Present:Mr. Aman Khullar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Harshita Wadhwa, Advocate for Ms. Puja Chopra, Advocate for respondent No. 1.
M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that this Writ Petition
has become infructuous since the entire dues are paid.
Dismissed as infructuous.
No costs.
(M.S. Ramachandra Rao)
Judge
(H.S. Madaan) Judge
September 27, 2022 P.Singh Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Whether Reportable? Yes/No
PARVINDER SINGH 2022.09.29 09:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Ranjit Singh
The Managing Director, Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Company
another
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
H.S. Madaan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
