COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 10030 of 2022 Date of Decision: September 21, 2022
AU Small Finance Bank Limited ...Petitioner
Versus
District Magistrate-cum-Deputy Commissioner, Fazilka and others
...Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao Hon'ble Mr. Justice H.S. Madaan
Present:Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Shivani Sharma, DAG, Punjab for respondents No. 1 and 2.
M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the Writ Petition
has become infurcutous and the same be disposed of.
Dismissed as infructuous.
No costs.
(M.S. Ramachandra Rao) Judge
(H.S. Madaan) Judge
September 21, 2022 P.Singh Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Whether Reportable? Yes/No
PARVINDER SINGH 2022.09.26 14:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
