Writ petition for quashing adverse service remarks and denial of promotion was dismissed as the petitioner died during pendency and legal representatives did not pursue the matter after notice.
Writ petition dismissed for want of interest on the part of the legal representatives following the petitioner's death.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
532
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.18137 of 2001 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.10.2022
Ram Parkash
…Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana and others …Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present: Mr. Rakesh Nagpal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. R. D. Sharma, DAG, Haryana.
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Petition herein, inter alia , is for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the adverse remarks for the years 1985-86 to 199798 conveyed to the petitioner vide letter dated 25.02.1999 (Annexure P-4) and also quashing the order dated 09.08.2001 (Annexure P-17) whereby the promotion has been denied to the petitioner.
10.10.2022 (ARUN MONGA) rittu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
RITTU
2022.10.28 16:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Ram Parkash
State of Haryana
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
