Petitioner requested withdrawal of writ petition to pursue common law remedies. Court dismissed petition as withdrawn.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed and petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-16959-2022 (O&M) Date of decision:- 04.08.2022
Deepak Singh Negi
...Petitioner(s)
Versus
Chandigarh Administration, U.T. Secretariat, Sector 9, Chandigarh through Advisor to the Administrator, Chandigarh and others.
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI SHANKER JHA, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI
Present: Mr. Jagtar Kureel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Amit Jhanji, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Abhishek Kumar Premi, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 to 5.
RAVI SHANKER JHA, C.J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the writ petition as he wishes to avail the other remedies available to him under common law.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(RAVI SHANKER JHA) CHIEF JUSTICE
(ARUN PALLI) JUDGE
04.08.2022
Amodh Sharma
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No |
|---|---|
| Whether reportable | Yes/No |
AMODH SHARMA 2022.08.04 15:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Deepak Singh Negi
Chandigarh Administration
Ravi Shanker Jha
Arun Palli
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
