The petitioner's counsel submitted that, having expired, the petition had become rendered infructuous. The court dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 6581 of 2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.08.2022
Dr. Rouble Sharma …..Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others …..Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI SHANKER JHA, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI, JUDGE
Present : Ms. Aashna Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Avinit Avasthi, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab= respondent No.1. Mr. Himanshu Arora, Advocate and
Mr. Varun Dutta, Junior Panel Counsel for respondent No.2.
��������������������������������������
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner having expired, the petition has become rendered infructuous and is abated.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
(RAVI SHANKER JHA) CHIEF JUSTICE
(ARUN PALLI) JUDGE
03.08.2022
| ravinder | Whether speaking/reasoned | √Yes/No |
|---|---|---|
| Whether reportable | Yes/No√ |
RAVINDER SHARMA 2022.08.04 11:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Dr. Rouble Sharma
State of Punjab
Ravi Shanker Jha
Arun Palli
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
