The High Court allowed the withdrawal of a writ petition filed by M/S D.V. Automobiles as the respondent-State had already issued the necessary certificate for registration, dismissing the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.1620 of 2021(O&M) Date of Decision-07.04.2022
M/S D.V. Automobiles ... Petitioner Versus
Union of India and others ... Respondents
CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Present: Mr. Rajiv Atma Ram, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Rajat Khanna, Advocate and Mr. Ashutosh, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Dheeraj Jain, Sr. Panel Counsel with Mr. Sahil Garg, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr. Tarun Vir Singh Lehal, Addl., A.G., Punjab.
RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J.
In the present writ petition, as per affidavit dated 01.04.2021, needful in the context of issuance of certificate for registration has already been done by the respondent-State, therefore, permission to withdraw this writ petition is allowed.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(RAJ MOHAN SINGH)
JUDGE
07.04.2022
Prince
Whether reasoned/speaking Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PRINCE SAINI 2022.04.08 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
M/S D.V. Automobiles
Union of India
RAJ MOHAN SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
