This order disposes of a writ petition and an application to prepone hearing. The court found the writ petition infructuous as the petitioner's account was settled and the application was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 5167 of 2020 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 20, 2022
Shyam Babu Verma
...Petitioner
Versus
Punjab and Sind Bank
...Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao Hon'ble Mr. Justice H.S. Madaan
Present:Mr. Sameer S. Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. ABS Sidhu, Advocate for respondent-Bank.
M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J. (Oral)
CM-4653-CWP-2020
This is an application for preponing the date of hearing of the main
case from 13.5.2020 to any other date.
The application is disposed of having become infructuous.
CM-4655-CWP-2020
The application is dismissed as not pressed.
CWP No. 5167 of 2020
Learned counsel appearing on either side state that the account of the
petitioner has been settled, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
No costs.
(M.S. Ramachandra Rao) Judge
(H.S. Madaan) Judge
September 20, 2022 P.Singh Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Whether Reportable? Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2022.09.22 16:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Shyam Babu Verma
Punjab and Sind Bank
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
H.S. Madaan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
