Puneet Goyal v. Gajender Sharma
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
223 CRR-1163-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.12.2022
Puneet Goyal …Petitioner
Versus
Gajender Sharma …Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:None for the petitioner Mr. Karan Garg, AAG, Haryana Mr. Jashan Singh Sekhon, Advocate, for the respondent *********
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
Learned State counsel, at the outset, submits that the
petitioner has passed away, thus, present petition stands abated.
Dismissed as infructuous.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
19.12.2022 Mohit Kumar
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
MOHIT KUMAR 2022.12.20 06:57
Puneet Goyal
Gajender Sharma
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court