Petitioners sought to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail any permissible legal remedy. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail remedy as permissible by law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
229 CRM-M-5346-2017
Date of Decision: 19.12.2022
Shubham and Others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and Others …Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:Mr. Sukhdeep Singh, Advocate, for Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners Mr. Karan Garg, AAG, Haryana Ms. Kamlesh Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 and 3 *********
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, seeks
permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail remedy as permissible by law.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
19.12.2022
Mohit Kumar
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
MOHIT KUMAR 2022.12.20 06:57
Shubham and Others
State of Haryana and Others
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
