Petitioners withdrew a Section 482 CrPC petition seeking quashing of an FIR, permitting entry for a fresh petition with better particulars.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
121 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-6022-2022 Date of decision-14.02.2022
Paviter Kaur and another State of Punjab and another
Vs.
...Petitioners
...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL
Present: Mr. P.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate for the petitioners.
SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL)
Heard through video conferencing.
Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No.7, dated 31.01.2019 registered for offence under Sections 323, 324 and 120-B of IPC (Sections 326, 498-A, 420 and 406 of IPC were added later on), at Police Station Begowal, District Kapurthala (Annexure P-1).
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
(SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE
14.02.2022
geeta
| Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No |
|---|
| Whether Reportable : Yes/No |
GEETA RANI 2022.02.14 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Paviter Kaur and another
State of Punjab and another
Suvir Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
