Amir Khan v. State of Ut Chandigarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's Section 439 Cr.P.C. bail petition disposed of as infructuous because he had already been convicted.
Petitioner's Section 439 Cr.P.C. bail petition disposed of as infructuous because he had already been convicted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-3440-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision:-4.8.2022
Amir Khan … Petitioner
Versus
State of U.T., Chandigarh ... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Danishwar Ali, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ankur Bali, Addl.P.P., U.T., Chandigarh.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
It has been informed that the petitioner stands convicted.
In view of the aforestated position, the instant petition filed
under provisions of Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of regular bail is rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such.
4.8.2022 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
PANKAJ KAKKAR 2022.08.04 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Amir Khan
State of U.T., Chandigarh
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court