Petitioner challenged via anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Held application rendered infructuous as petitioner was already arrested.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed as petitioner was already arrested.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-3434-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision:-2.8.2022
Raj Singh @ Raju
… Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. A.S. Dhindsa, Advocate for Mr. Janak Singh Bhinder, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Harpreet S. Multani, AAG, Punjab.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J .(Oral)
Today, at the very outset, learned State counsel, upon instructions from the Investigating Officer, has informed that the petitioner already stands arrested.
In view of the aforestated position, the instant petition filed under provisions of Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail is rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such.
2.8.2022 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
PANKAJ KAKKAR 2022.08.02 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. should be accepted when the petitioner is already arrested.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raj Singh @ Raju
State of Punjab
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
