The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed an FIR and subsequent proceedings on the basis of a voluntary compromise recorded by the Judicial Magistrate, relying on the Full Bench decision in Kulwinder Singh.
FIR No.168 dated 13.9.2019 and all subsequent proceedings therefrom were quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-2768-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 02.8.2022
Sunny and others … Petitioners Versus
State of Punjab and another ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:None for the petitioners.
Mr. Luvinder Sofat, AAG, Punjab.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
MOHAN SINGH 2022.08.02 04:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
- 2 - CRM-M-2768-2020 (O&M)
that they have compromised the matter amongst themselves. It has also been informed that petitioner No.4-Kamlesh Rani has expired on 15.2.2021.
| 02.8.2022 | (GURVIN | DER SINGH GILL) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| mohan | JUDGE | ||
| Whether speaking /reasoned | Yes / No | ||
| Whether Reportable | Yes / No |
MOHAN SINGH 2022.08.02 04:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR under Sections 323, 324, 341, and 32 IPC should be quashed on the basis of a voluntary compromise between the parties.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of PunjabFollowed¶6
2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab
Sunny and others
State of Punjab and another
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
