The petition was dismissed as withdrawn following the production of an affidavit by the complainant stating that the matter has been amicably resolved via compromise between the parties. No adjudication on substantive legal points was made.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn by order of the Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-1765-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision:-5.8.2022
Manas Dutta … Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Jagjot Singh Lalli, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. R.S. Sidhu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab.
None for respondents No.2 and 3. *****
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
Today, at the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have since entered into a compromise and infact a petition for quashing of the FIR on the basis of compromise has also been filed in this Court. Learned counsel has today produced an affidavit of the complainant, wherein it has been specifically deposed that the matter stands amicably resolved amongst the parties. The said affidavit is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the aforesaid compromise, he does not wish to press upon the present petition and that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the aforesaid request, the instant petition is dismissed
as withdrawn.
| 5.8.2022 | ( Gu | rvinder Singh Gill ) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| pankaj | Judge | ||
| Whether speaking /reasoned | Yes / No | ||
| Whether Reportable | Yes / No |
PANKAJ KAKKAR 2022.08.05 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Manas Dutta
State of Punjab
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
