Sandeep Kumar @ Sodhi v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
Convictions under Sections 376(2)(g) and 302 of IPC were challenged in two connected appeals. The supplied text is largely corrupted, and this court's decision cannot be reliably extracted.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
���������������������������������������� �������������
301
(i) CRA-D-935-DB-2011 (O&M) Reserved on: 18.11.2022 Date of Decision: 19.12.2022
SANDEEP KUMAR @ SODHI -Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB -Respondent
(ii) CRA-D-1042-DB-2011 Reserved on: 18.11.2022 Date of Decision: 19.12.2022
DINESH KUMAR @ RAJ -Appellant Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB -Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI
Argued by: Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sammi, Advocate for the appellant in CRA-D-935-DB-2011.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SANDEEP KUMAR @ SODHI
- appellant
DINESH KUMAR @ RAJ
- respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRA-D/935/2011
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court