Dinesh Kumar Alias Raj v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
The text provided is largely corrupted and consists of garbled characters and a brief docket sheet with names and dates. The substantive content of the judgment, including the court's reasoning, decision, and facts, is not readable.
What the court decided
���������������������������������������� �������������
CRA-D-1042-DB-2011 Reserved on: 18.11.2022 Date of Decision: 19.12.2022
DINESH KUMAR @ RAJ
-Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
-Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI
Argued by: Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sammi, Advocate for the appellant in CRA-D-935-DB-2011.
Mr. P.P.Chahar, Advocate
Amicus Curiae for the appellant in CRA-D-1042-DB-2011.
Ms. Monika Jalota, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
DINESH KUMAR @ RAJ
- respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Coram
SURESHWAR THAKUR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRA-D/1042/2011
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court