The High Court of Punjab and Haryana held a petition infructuous without substantive reasoning and disposed of the revision petition accordingly in a one-line order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
110
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Revision No. 6770 of 2017 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 04.08.2022
Smt. Jaiwanti
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and Others
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.
Present: Mr. Sunny Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent No.1 to 4.
Dr. Parveen Hans, Advocate for the respondent No.5.
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
present revision petition has been rendered infructuous and the same be disposed of as such.
(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge
August 04, 2022 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.08.06 10:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Smt. Jaiwanti
State of Haryana
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
