Remanded

Manisha Sarin and Ors. v. General Public and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC4 Aug 2022CR/3352/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court set aside an order dismissing a petition under Section 372 of the India Succession Act, 1925. The court remanded the matter for afresh consideration on the basis that jurisdiction depends on the deceased's residence or property location under Section 371, not the registered offices of companies.

What did the court decide?

Order under challenge set aside; matter remitted for deciding afresh on territorial jurisdiction and maintainability.

Manisha Sarin and Ors. Vs General Public… — Succession and Inheritance | Punjab & Haryana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

106

¶3

CR-3352-2015(O&M) Date of decision: 04.08.2022

¶4

MANISHA SARIN AND ORS.

¶5

..Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

GENERAL PUBLIC AND ORS.

¶8

..Respondents

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶10

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J(Oral)

¶11

The Additional Civil Judge Senior Division, Rajpura, has dismissed a petition filed under Section 372 of the India Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), on the ground that the registered offices of the various companies are located in Mumbai, New Delhi, Ahmedabad, Gaziabad, Ludhiana, Rewari and Banglore.

¶12

It is evident that the Court has overlooked Section 371 of the Act which reads as under:-

¶13

“ 371. Court having jurisdiction to grant certificate. — The District Judge within whose jurisdiction the deceased ordinarily resided at the time of his death, or, if at that time he had no fixed place of residence, the District Judge, within whose jurisdiction any part of the property of the deceased may be found, may grant a certificate under this Part.”

¶14

It is evident that the application for grant of succession certificate is required to be filed either before the Court within whose jurisdiction the deceased, ordinarily, resided at the time of his death or if at the time of death, he had no fixed place of residence, the District Judge within whose jurisdiction any part of the property of the deceased may be found.

¶15

MOHD AYUB 2022.08.10 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document.

¶16

CR-3352-2015(O&M)

¶17

-2-

¶18

In the present case, widow and mother of two minor children of the deceased filed an application for grant of succession certificate with respect to the various shares held by the deceased in various companies.

¶19

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the order under challenge is set aside. The matter is remitted back to the Court for deciding afresh. The Court shall be entitled to examine the maintainability of the petition with regard to the territorial jurisdiction and with reference to Section 371 of the Act along with the assertions made in the petition.

¶20

The petitioner through his counsel is directed to appear before the Court on 23.08.2022.

¶21

All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of.

¶22

August 04^th , 2022 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) Ay JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶23

MOHD AYUB 2022.08.10 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document.

Manisha Sarin and Ors. v. General Public and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manisha Sarin and Ors. v. General Public and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Employees Provident Fund Organization Vs M/S Darshan Forgings Pvt. Ltd.

Punjab Financial Corporation Vs Official Liquidator(M/S Darshan Forging P. Ltd.)

Rajwinder Singh and Anr. Vs Shubham Sood

Agarwal Auto Traders Vs Standard Agriculture

Managing Director Gawad Construction Co. and Anothers Vs Deepender Singh and Others

Jaiwanti Thr Spa Vs State of Haryana Thr Collector and Ors.