Single judge dismissed the revision petition relying on Sri Rathnavarmaraja v. Smt. Vimla, ruling that a revision challenging an order dismissing a court fee application is not maintainable.
Present revision petition dismissed; miscellaneous application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
106
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Revision No. 4485 of 2018 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 24.03.2022
Shri Brahman and Tirthodwar Sabha (Regd.)
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
Sh. Ashwani Kumar Walia and Others
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.
Present: Mr. Ravinder Malik (Ravi), Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Dr. Deepak Jindal, Advocate for the respondent No.1 and 2. Mr. Rajinder Goyal, Advocate for the respondent No.6.
Ms. Vaishali Kamboj , Advocate for Mr. Ravinder Singh Budhwar, Advocate for the respondent No.8.
Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent No.9.
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
Smt. Vimla AIR 1961 SC 1299 , the revision petition challenging the order passed by the trial Court dismissing an application filed by him pointing out the deficiency of court fee, is not maintainable. Hence, the present revision petition is dismissed.
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.03.29 13:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Civil Revision No. 4485 of 2018 (O&M) 2
disposed of.
(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge
March 24, 2022 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.03.29 13:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a revision petition challenging an order dismissing an application for deficiency of court fee is maintainable.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sri Rathnavarmaraja v. Smt. VimlaApplied¶16
Sri Rathnavarmaraja v. Smt. Vimla AIR 1961 SC 1299 · Who else cites this
Shri Brahman and Tirthodwar Sabha (Regd.)
Sh. Ashwani Kumar Walia
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
