This order refers the parties to a detailed order of even date passed in a previous matter (CRM-M-31291-2019) and contains no substantive reasoning, facts, or disposition.
This order refers the parties to a detailed order of even date passed in a previous matter (CRM-M-31291-2019) and contains no substantive reasoning, facts, or disposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
230+3
COCP-1661-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.12.2022
Rakesh Gupta and Another …Petitioners
Versus
Rahul Tiwari, Secretary, State of Punjab and Others …Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:Mr. Kamal Mor, Advocate for Mr. Mr. Saurabh Dalal, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Gaurav Gurcharan Singh Rai, DAG, Haryana None for the complainant *****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
For orders, see detailed order of even date passed in
CRM-M-31291-2019 (O&M); Rakesh Gupta and Another Versus State of Punjab and Another .
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
20.12.2022
Mohit Kumar
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
MOHIT KUMAR 2022.12.20 21:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Rakesh Gupta
State of Punjab
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
