Allowed

M/S Trend Setters v. M/S Lpt Retail Private Ltd. and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC22 Dec 2022ARB/68/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after ensuring compliance with service requirements via substituted service, allowing the petitioner's arbitration petition to be heard ex parte.

What did the court decide?

Mr. Gurtej Singh appointed as sole Arbitrator; proceedings to be conducted ex parte regarding respondents.

M/S Trend Setters Vs M/S Lpt Retail Private Ltd. and Ors. — Arbitration | Punjab & Haryana HC (2022)

¶1

-1-

¶2

ARB No. 68 of 2018 (O&M)

¶3

205

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶5

ARB No. 68 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.12.2022

¶6

M/s Trend Setters -Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

M/s LPT Retail Pvt. Ltd. and others -Respondents

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH

¶10

Present: Mr. Karan Singh Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶11

None for the respondents. ****

¶12

RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J. (Oral)

¶13

The petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an independent arbitrator in order to adjudicate the dispute between the parties arising out of Buyer Seller Agreement dated 28.11.2016.

¶14

Vide the aforesaid agreement, the petitioner was given franchisee right to sell goods on behalf of the respondent No.1 on return basis. As per terms and conditions of the agreement, the seller shall supply the goods to the buyer i.e. the petitioner on sale or return basis. If the goods are not sold, the seller undertakes to take back the goods within six months. The buyer shall exclusively stock the goods of the seller and subject to the availability, the seller shall supply to the buyer regularly

¶15

JYOTI SHARMA 2022.12.23 13:09 I attest to the authenticity and accuracy of this order/judgment

¶16

ARB No. 68 of 2018 (O&M)

¶17

-2-

¶18

the said goods in quantities subject to meet the demands at the store of buyer. The buyer shall arrange an appropriate space i.e. 1000 sq. feet ground floor as built up area for the display and sale of the products of the Company at a specified place. The fixtures, Gondolas and hanging system shall be provided by the seller and the seller also agrees to provide the buyer the margins on sale of goods (Net of VAT). Monthly guarantee of Rs.65,000/- + 13% margins of NRV Sale or 28% on sale Value (Net of VAT) (whichever is higher, reconciliation on yearly basis). The buyer shall ensure that the sale proceeds are deposited in the seller's bank account on daily basis after adjustment of above said margins. The buyer shall at all times maintain accurate and fully updated record and inventory. The seller or its agent shall be entitled to check or verify the record at any reasonable time. The buyer shall also pay an amount of Rs.8 lacs as interest free refundable security against the stock at the premises. The seller shall refund the deposit of Rs.8 lacs to the buyer after expiry of the agreement, subject to settlement of all pending due accounts. The buyer has also issued two cheques in a total sum of Rs.25 lacs towards security.

¶19

Both the parties entered into commercial activities. There is a dispute redressal mechanism provided under para no.23 of the agreement. A dispute arose between the parties

¶20

JYOTI SHARMA 2022.12.23 13:09 I attest to the authenticity and accuracy of this order/judgment

¶21

-3-

¶22

ARB No. 68 of 2018 (O&M)

¶23

and the petitioner has already issued a legal notice claiming an amount of Rs.13,38,951/- towards monthly guarantee upto October, 2017. An amount of Rs.25 lacs towards undated cheques was encashed by the respondents. In total, the petitioner has staked his claim to the tune of Rs.38,38,951/- for which the petitioner has already invoked the arbitration clause no.23 of the agreement.

¶24

Notice of motion was issued on 16.03.2018. The respondents could not be served by means of ordinary process of service. Thereafter notices through registered post were ordered to be issued on 23.08.2022 for 10.11.2022. The registered notices were received back unserved with the report that the respondents were not residing on the given address. Thereafter, vide order dated 10.11.2022, the respondents were directed to be served by means of substituted service under Order 5 Rule 20 read with Section 151 CPC.

¶25

The petitioner has placed on record relevant newspaper cutting showing that provisions under Order 5 Rule 20 read with Section 151 CPC have been complied with.

¶26

There is no representation on behalf of the respondents and therefore, they are proceeded against exparte.

¶27

The claim of the petitioner has gone unrebutted.

¶28

JYOTI SHARMA 2022.12.23 13:09 I attest to the authenticity and accuracy of this order/judgment

¶29

-4-

¶30

ARB No. 68 of 2018 (O&M)

¶31

Existence of agreement having arbitration clause has not been denied.

¶32

In view of consensus arrived at between the parties, I deem it appropriate to appoint Mr. Gurtej Singh, Addl. Excise & Taxation Commissioner, # 3382, Sector 71, Mohali, Mobile No.9698700003 as the sole Arbitrator, to resolve the dispute/difference between the parties. The appointment of the Arbitrator shall be subject to the declaration to be made by him as required under Section 12 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in respect of his independence and impartiality to settle the dispute between the parties.

¶33

The Arbitrator would complete the proceedings within the specified time in terms of Section 29-A of the said Act. The Arbitrator shall be paid fee in accordance with the IVth Schedule of the Act as amended from time to time. The fee shall be borne by the petitioner and respondent(s) in equal proportion.

¶34

The venue will be as per the convenience of the Arbitrator.

¶35

A copy of this order be dispatched to the Arbitrator at the following address:-

¶36

Mr. Gurtej Singh, Addl. Excise & Taxation Commissioner, # 3382, Sector 71, Mohali, Mobile No.9698700003

¶37

JYOTI SHARMA 2022.12.23 13:09 I attest to the authenticity and accuracy of this order/judgment

¶38

-5-

¶39

ARB No. 68 of 2018 (O&M)

¶40

12. Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

¶41

22.12.2022 (RAJ MOHAN SINGH) Jyoti Sharma JUDGE

¶42

1.Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No 2.Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶43

JYOTI SHARMA 2022.12.23 13:09 I attest to the authenticity and accuracy of this order/judgment

M/S Trend Setters v. M/S Lpt Retail Private Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Trend Setters v. M/S Lpt Retail Private Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Kulwinder Singh and Company, Engineers and Contractors Vs Chief Engineer (North), Water Supply and Sanitation Department and Anr.

M/S Anjaniputra Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs Rajinder Singh

M/S Anjaniputra Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs Amrik Singh and Others

Jitf Urban Waste Management Ltd. Vs Municipal Corporation, Bathinda and Anr.

M/S Sekhu Transport Com. Vs State of Punjab and Another

Gurpreet Kaur and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Another