In a writ petition, the High Court directed Respondent No. 2 to consider the petitioner's objections regarding bus timetable approval within one month and pass an appropriate order.
Direction to Respondent No. 2 to consider pending objections and pass an order within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
CWP No. 29900 of 2022
118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 29900 of 2022 Date of Decision: 22.12.2022
M/s Sekhu Transport Company
-Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
-Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Present: Mr. Rajinder Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. ****
RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J. (Oral)
The petitioner has preferred this writ petition for the issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.2 to consider the claim of the petitioner for approval of joint time table for operation of its bus plying from Talwandi Sabo to Bathinda route and back in accordance with law.
Precisely, for the claim in question, the petitioner has already filed objections dated 24.11.2022.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied in case a time bound direction is given to the respondent No.2 to take note of pending objections dated 24.11.2022 and pass a speaking order in accordance with law.
JYOTI SHARMA 2022.12.22 17:09 I attest to the authenticity and accuracy of this order/judgment
CWP No. 29900 of 2022
-2-
Notice of motion.
On the asking of the Court, Mr. Sanjeev Soni, Addl. A.G., Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
In view of nature of prayer made by the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to take note of pending objections dated 24.11.2022 got issued by the petitioner and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, preferably within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
22.12.2022 (RAJ MOHAN SINGH) Jyoti Sharma JUDGE
JYOTI SHARMA 2022.12.22 17:09 I attest to the authenticity and accuracy of this order/judgment
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a time-bound direction should be issued to the respondent to consider the petitioner's objections regarding joint timetable approval.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a speaking order concerning its claim for bus route operation approval.
M/s Sekhu Transport Company
State of Punjab
another
Raj Mohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
